Dan Skovronsky, Eli Lilly’s chief scientific officer, at the STAT Summit in Boston.Jeff Pinette for STAT

Ed Silverman, a senior writer and Pharmalot columnist at STAT, has been covering the pharmaceutical industry for nearly three decades. He is also the author of the morning Pharmalittle newsletter and the afternoon Pharmalot newsletter.

As far as Eli Lilly’s Dan Skovronsky is concerned, the revolving door can spin in a good direction.

The drugmaker last week hired Peter Marks, a former top Food and Drug Administration official, and the move quickly sparked a fresh round of concern about conflicts of interest between the agency and industry, as well as about public trust. To wit, might the hiring provide Lilly with an unfair advantage? And do such offers somehow compromise decision-making at the FDA?

Advertisement

Skovronsky, the company’s chief scientific officer, not surprisingly, sees it differently. In his view, the criticism is understandable, but to block officials who have served the public from joining industry would limit them from potentially making useful contributions to society going forward. And this is particularly true when it comes to developing beneficial medicines.

STAT+ Exclusive Story

STAT+

This article is exclusive to STAT+ subscribers

Unlock this article — plus in-depth analysis, newsletters, premium events, and news alerts.

Already have an account? Log in

Monthly

$39

Totals $468 per year

$39/month Get Started

Totals $468 per year

Starter

$30

for 3 months, then $399/year

$30 for 3 months Get Started

Then $399/year

Annual

$399

Save 15%

$399/year Get Started

Save 15%

11+ Users

Custom

Savings start at 25%!

Request A Quote Request A Quote

Savings start at 25%!

2-10 Users

$300

Annually per user

$300/year Get Started

$300 Annually per user

View All Plans

To read the rest of this story subscribe to STAT+.

Subscribe