an anthropomorphized red and blue pill illustrated in the style of the famous american gothic painting
Alex Hogan/STAT

Ed Silverman, a senior writer and Pharmalot columnist at STAT, has been covering the pharmaceutical industry for nearly three decades. He is also the author of the morning Pharmalittle newsletter and the afternoon Pharmalot newsletter.

Good morning, everyone, and welcome to another working week. We hope the weekend respite was relaxing and rewarding, because that oh-so-familiar routine of meetings, online calls, and deadlines has predictably returned. But what can you do? The world keeps spinning no matter how much we push back. So time to get on with it. Please join us for a cup of stimulation — hot buttered rum is our choice today — as we cast about for items of interest. Speaking of which, here are some tidbits. Hope your day goes well…

Weight-loss drugs may eventually reach only about 50% of the overweight ‌and obese people who could benefit from them due to complexities of health care systems and financial constraints, Reuters writes, citing comments made by Eli Lilly chief executive officer David Ricks said at a conference. Lilly and Novo Nordisk are competing for share in the global market for ​GLP-1 drugs, which analysts see topping $100 billion per year in the next decade. But ​just one in 10 people who are overweight or obese are using GLP-1s. “It’s never going to be a hundred,” Ricks said. “For institutional reasons ​in health care and some other complexities in managing health, it’s never going to be that high.” He pointed to low-cost statins, ​the most commonly prescribed cholesterol drugs, as a comparable example. “Between 40 and 50% of people who should be on them, are on them. I think of that as maybe a ceiling,” he said.

Advertisement

The Trump administration’s desire to pry open the black box of prescription drug prices is facing stiff opposition from the phalanx of lobbyists representing pharmacy benefit managers and health insurers, STAT notes. In January, the U.S. Department of Labor proposed a rule that would mandate PBMs disclose a wide range of drug pricing information to employers and make it easier to be audited. The public had until last week to submit comments. A review of the more than 500 letters reflects varying interests: predictable resistance from PBMs and health insurers; enthusiasm from Mark Cuban’s pharmacy and others in the business community who want middlemen to face more accountability; and drug companies cheered PBMs being in the regulatory crosshairs but wanted pullback on disclosure of drug pricing data. 

STAT+ Exclusive Story

STAT+

This article is exclusive to STAT+ subscribers

Unlock this article — plus in-depth analysis, newsletters, premium events, and news alerts.

Already have an account? Log in

Monthly

$39

Totals $468 per year

$39/month Get Started

Totals $468 per year

Starter

$30

for 3 months, then $399/year

$30 for 3 months Get Started

Then $399/year

Annual

$399

Save 15%

$399/year Get Started

Save 15%

11+ Users

Custom

Savings start at 25%!

Request A Quote Request A Quote

Savings start at 25%!

2-10 Users

$300

Annually per user

$300/year Get Started

$300 Annually per user

View All Plans

To read the rest of this story subscribe to STAT+.

Subscribe